In this blog post, we are taking the next step to developing our topic proposal. By now, hopefully you have identified a highly debatable issue that is related to our theme and related to your interest. I'm hoping that we can make a clear link between the issue of your choice and your positionality.Also by now, it should be clear what your position is on the issue. You need to know this, and know it clearly. If you do not have a clear opinion, I recommend that you reconsider the topic.
Making an opinion is an easy thing to do. We do it several times per day. When someone asks us our opinion on any given subject, we can usually answer. We may feel strongly or not strongly, but nevertheless we can usually recognize which side of the debate we are on.
The harder part is to outline how we arrive at our opinion. That is, can we identify what assumptions we have on which our opinion is based. These assumptions are what we call premises.
For example, I may have a clear and direct position such as this: I do not support the building of dams on the Mekong River. This is an easy statement to make. The harder step is to outline premises that lead me to this position. There are many ways to do it. But it depends on how I intend to argue this.
Let's say that I want to argue it from an environmental perspective.
I may begin like this:
The Mekong River is one of the most ecologically diverse and sensitive rivers in the world.
This premise sets the argument around the river being "ecologically diverse and sensitive". Let's develop from here.
An ecologically diverse and sensitive river requires a stable environment in order to survive.
Here I have introduced the importance of a "stable environment". Keep going.
Damming the Mekong River will bring instability to the environment, which will threaten the diversity and sensitivity of this river.
This premise introduces the impact of the dam. Which will take me to the final premise.
It is very important to protect and preserve the diversity and sensitivity of the Mekong River.
This premise introduces the importance of protecting the unique ecology of the Mekong, which ultimately brings me to my position.
I do not support the building of dams on the Mekong River.
In the end, my argument looks like this all together:
The Mekong River is one of the most ecologically diverse and sensitive rivers in the world. An ecologically diverse and sensitive river requires a stable environment in order to survive. Damming the Mekong River will bring instability to the environment, which will threaten the diversity and sensitivity of this river. It is very important to protect and preserve the diversity and sensitivity of the Mekong River. I do not support the building of dams on the Mekong River.
This is a well-reasoned position. And it is argued from an environmental perspective (and not an economic or social perspective). You need to know what type of debate you're having, and it should be reflected in your premises.
In this blog, I want you to share your reasoning by outlining your premises that lead to your position.
Remember to include your ID# in your post. Please make your post by May 28. Aj. M

